3D model/photographic walk through presented an excellent opportunity to introduce the site to the audience. A pity that this opportunity was not seized; the video, which was meant to be used as tool to deconstruct the site, sadly abandoned its artisan. It is important for the speaker to own the presentation.
Interesting observations made e.g. dustbin count [supposed oversupply due to advertising benefits], traffic light sequencing, Braamfontein branding identity. Some overly apparent observations were seemingly over-looked e.g. The Pick n Pay at Braamfontein Centre, one could question its location which lends to a somewhat disruptive sidewalk experience at certain times of the day [possibly better location across the street, with courtyard and ample space for people to gather?]
Drawings/ Photographs/ Sections were delectable, the attention to detail and creativity worthy of eulogy. Very well done.
The group evidently put in a great deal of work into their presentation but this was negated by it coming across rather fragmented with members lacking the verbal skills, or content to explain and unpack certain urban components. Views, when expressed, where overly private with the repeated use of the word “I” by various group members. I think the group members lost out on their most lucrative asset; “each other”. Would propose a “logic” in unpacking their work – e.g. – Social, Economical, Political, Physical components.
Suggest the group engages council urban planners, their plans, objectives policies etc.
